{"id":414,"date":"2007-01-05T13:06:41","date_gmt":"2007-01-05T20:06:41","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.nicknormal.com\/normalblog\/2007\/01\/05\/city-of-the-future-candidates\/"},"modified":"2009-03-17T06:42:46","modified_gmt":"2009-03-17T13:42:46","slug":"city-of-the-future-candidates","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.nicknormal.com\/normalblog\/city-of-the-future-candidates\/","title":{"rendered":"City of the Future candidates"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" decoding=\"async\" id=\"image415\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.nicknormal.com\/normalblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2007\/01\/future-city-candidates.jpg?w=640&#038;ssl=1\" alt=\"City of the Future candidates\" \/><\/p>\n<p>The History Channel&#8217;s City of the Future candidates from Chicago, Los Angeles and New York have been announced and voting started two days ago. A regional (sort of) competition was held in each of those three cities and the winning candidate then represents their city in the now-national competition to &#8220;determine the architectural design that best addresses the issues of the 22nd century.&#8221; The History Channel are asking voters, which they oddly refer to as the &#8216;consumer vote&#8217;, to cast their entry against the following criteria:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>*  Which proposal and model is most original?<br \/>\n* Did the proposed vision address the competition issues of Demographics, Commerce and Industry, Housing, Culture and Leisure, Infrastructure, Transportation, the Environment and Sustainable Design?<br \/>\n* Does the proposed vision respond to the existing city?<br \/>\n* Does the design illustrate inspiration or lessons learned from the past civilizations featured in the Engineering an Empire series?<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Now I have lived (or in my current situation do live) in two of the three cities in this competition, so I have a bit of personal insight (and bias!). My least-favorite candidate is LA, obviously. First off, it&#8217;s LA.<\/p>\n<p>Do I need another reason? Okay fine.<\/p>\n<p>Their submission only further compartmentalizes the arrangement of infrastructure, divides and re-disperses resources in a way that <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ericowenmoss.com\/index.php?\/projects\/project\/the_city_of_the_future\/\">proclaims to use existing infrastructure for the foundation of the new<\/a>, while leaving places like current-downtown LA to become <a class=\"imagelink\" href=\"https:\/\/www.nicknormal.com\/normalblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2007\/01\/render_6_project.jpg\" title=\"City of the Future - LA\" rel=\"lightbox\">a ghost of its former self.<\/a><\/p>\n<p>That leaves us with Chicago and New York.<\/p>\n<p>Well even though New York is my current home, our representatives, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.aro.net\/\">ARO: Architecture Research Office<\/a>, leave us with <a href=\"http:\/\/www.aro.net\/city%20of%20the%20future\/ARO_City%20of%20the%20Future.pdf\">a measly one-page poorly-rendered PDF<\/a> that does little to detail or explain their concept &#8211; the notion of &#8216;vanes&#8217; which I might add is brilliant, the crappy presentation notwithstanding. They also fail completely, having contracted what I call New York County Complex, or the belief that somehow <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/New_York_City\">New York City<\/a> is only Manhattan, and dismissing the existence of the other four boroughs, or 297 sq. miles of land, or 6,471,083 inhabitants &#8211; oh you get the point already (had their proposal included everywhere and everyone else, I believe it would have been so ambitious it would have won outright).<\/p>\n<p>Which leaves me voting for Chicago, which I only lived in for one year &#8211; very brief &#8211; but which I have a strong fondness for (except for that Wrigley Field place and <a href=\"http:\/\/cubs.mlb.com\/\">the pitiable team that plays there<\/a>). Not only do UrbanLab have <a href=\"http:\/\/www.urbanlab.com\/index.php\">the most-informative, swanky and fluid website<\/a>, but their submission, under the title <a href=\"http:\/\/www.urbanlab.com\/h2o\/\">&#8216;Growing Water&#8217;<\/a> presents us with a very descriptive and well-sourced slideshow of facts and images that address pre-existing conditions while solving problems of sustainability and future growth, and a city where <a class=\"imagelink\" href=\"https:\/\/www.nicknormal.com\/normalblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2007\/01\/eco-boulevard.jpg\" title=\"City of the Future - Chicago\" rel=\"lightbox\">&#8216;eco-boulevards&#8217;<\/a> run throughout the grid of the city and said grid is overtaken by all types of organic life, from snails to wetland plants! Brilliant!<\/p>\n<p>But hey, who am I to tell you (psst, vote for Chicago) who to vote for (CHICAGO!). <a href=\"http:\/\/www.history.com\/designchallenge\/sweepstakes\/index.jsp\">View the submissions and vote for yourself<\/a> (<a href=\"http:\/\/www.history.com\/designchallenge\/sweepstakes\/registration.jsp?cityChoice=chicago\">or click here to vote for Chicago<\/a>).<\/p>\n<div class='ctx-module-container ctx_default_placement ctx-clearfix'><\/div><span class=\"ctx-article-root\"><!-- --><\/span>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The History Channel&#8217;s City of the Future candidates from Chicago, Los Angeles and New York have been announced and voting started two days ago. A regional (sort of) competition was held in each of those three cities and the winning candidate then represents their city in the now-national competition to &#8220;determine the architectural design that [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":415,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[11],"tags":[113,419,70],"series":[],"class_list":["post-414","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-news","tag-chicago","tag-los-angeles","tag-nyc"],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.nicknormal.com\/normalblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2007\/01\/future-city-candidates.jpg?fit=500%2C182&ssl=1","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p6OfVu-6G","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nicknormal.com\/normalblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/414","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nicknormal.com\/normalblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nicknormal.com\/normalblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nicknormal.com\/normalblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nicknormal.com\/normalblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=414"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.nicknormal.com\/normalblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/414\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3044,"href":"https:\/\/www.nicknormal.com\/normalblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/414\/revisions\/3044"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nicknormal.com\/normalblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/415"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nicknormal.com\/normalblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=414"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nicknormal.com\/normalblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=414"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nicknormal.com\/normalblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=414"},{"taxonomy":"series","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nicknormal.com\/normalblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/series?post=414"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}